-
Luke, J. 1. The alleged errors of omission and commission in the charge of the court, complained of in the motion for a new trial, do not, when considered in the light of the entire charge and the facts of the case, require a reversal of the judgment below.
2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and for no reason assigned was it error for the court to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, O. J., and Bloodivorth, J., concur.
Document Info
Docket Number: 15602
Citation Numbers: 32 Ga. App. 501, 124 S.E. 80, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 504
Judges: Luke
Filed Date: 7/15/1924
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/8/2024