-
Broyles, C. J. (After stating the foregoing facts.) 1. Under repeated rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court, a
*27 special ground of a motion for a new trial must be complete within itself; and a ground complaining of the admission of evidence must- show that the evidence was admitted over the objection of the movant and that the objection was made to the court at the time the evidence was offered; and the ground must further show what was the objection. Under this ruling the 1st, 4th, 5th, and 6th grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial cannot be considered.2. Under all the facts of the case, none of the remaining grounds of the motion for a new trial shows material error.
3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.
Document Info
Docket Number: 12226
Citation Numbers: 27 Ga. App. 26, 107 S.E. 376, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 655
Judges: Broyles
Filed Date: 5/11/1921
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024