Rainey v. McFarland , 29 Ga. App. 494 ( 1923 )

Bell, J.

Although the plaintiff in error, who was defendant in the trial court, recites in his bill of exceptions that a verdict adverse to him was by the court directed, the sole assignment of error is upon the overruling of his motion for a new trial, which contained the general grounds only; and, since the evidence did not demand a verdict in his favor, such judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.