-
Bloodworth, J. Under the evidence in this ease the court did not err for any reason alleged in any of the grounds of the motion for a new trial. Neither the charge that “any circumstance which would place a prudent man on his guard in purchasing a negotiable paper would be sufficient to constitute notice to a purchaser of such paper before it is due,” nor the verdict, is without evidence to support it. The motion for a new trial was properly overruled.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.
Document Info
Docket Number: 15181
Citation Numbers: 31 Ga. App. 756, 121 S.E. 879, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 169
Judges: Bloodworth
Filed Date: 3/6/1924
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/8/2024