-
Bloodwobth, J. 1. When those grounds of the motion for a new trial which allege errors in the charge of the court are read in connection with the remainder of the charge, they show no error requiring another trial of the case.
2. The contested issues of fact were properly submitted to the jury, who decided them in favor of the plaintiff; the trial judge approved the
*404 verdict, and as this court can not say that there is no evidence to support the verdict, it must stand.Decided March 5, 1929. Lillie & Dickerson, Bryan & Middlebrooks, for plaintiff in error. Copeland & Dukes, contra. Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, O. J., and Lulce, J., concur.
Document Info
Docket Number: 19353
Citation Numbers: 39 Ga. App. 403, 147 S.E. 536, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 336
Judges: Bloodwobth, Broyles, Lulce
Filed Date: 3/5/1929
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/8/2024