Mays v. State ( 1931 )

Broyles, C. J.

This case was tried before the judge, without the intervention of a jury, and the defendant was adjudged guilty of the offense charged. A motion for a new trial, based upon the usual general grounds, was overruled, and the defendant excepted. The defendant’s conviction was authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.