Hawkins v. State , 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 202 ( 1931 )


Menu:
  • Broyles, C. J.

    1. Special grounds 1, 2, and 3 of the motion for a new trial are not complete and understandable within themselves, and, therefore, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, can not be considered.

    2. Special grounds 4 and 5 of the motion for a new trial, when considered in the light of the trial judge’s note attached to each of those grounds, show no error.

    3. The verdict ivas amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

    Judgment affirmed.

    Luke and Bloockoorth, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: 21170

Citation Numbers: 43 Ga. App. 101, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 202, 157 S.E. 905

Judges: Broyles

Filed Date: 3/31/1931

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/8/2024