Hardin v. King Lumber Co. ( 1931 )

Broyles, O. J.

1. The court did not err in any of its rulings upon the pleadings.

2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence; and as the motion for a new trial contained tlie usual general grounds only, tlie refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Decided June 19, 1931. Zaclt Arnold, A. M. Zellner, II. A. Wilkinson, for plaintiff in error. James W. Harris, B. L. Williams, Jr., Bennet ■& Peacock, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.