Bass v. State ( 1932 )

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of stealing an automobile. The evidence connecting him with the offense, while wholly circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis except that of his guilt, and the court did not err in overruling his motion for a new trial, based on the usual general grounds only.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworih, J., absent on account of illness.