Butler v. State , 104 Ga. App. 777 ( 1961 )

Frankum, Judge.

The conviction of the accused was founded solely on circumstantial evidence which, given its strongest intendment against him, raised a strong suspicion of his guilt, but was not sufficient to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt.

Therefore, the court erred in denying his motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Nichols, P. J., and Jordan, J., concur.