Arthur Shermaine Bussey v. State ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    January 14, 2021
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A21D0168. ARTHUR SHERMAINE BUSSEY v. THE STATE.
    In 2002, Arthur Shermaine Bussey pled guilty to burglary and theft by
    receiving. In 2019, Bussey filed a motion challenging the validity of his arrest
    warrant. The trial court denied the motion twice, and this Court dismissed Bussey’s
    direct appeals of those two rulings. See Case Nos. A19A2089 (dismissed Oct. 17,
    2019) & A20A1652 (dismissed June 3, 2020). This Court explained in its dismissal
    orders that Bussey’s motion was in substance a challenge to the validity of his
    conviction, but a motion seeking to challenge an allegedly invalid or void judgment
    of conviction is not one of the established procedures for challenging the validity of
    a judgment in a criminal case, and an appeal from the denial of such a motion is
    subject to dismissal. See Roberts v. State, 
    286 Ga. 532
    , 532 (690 SE2d 150) (2010);
    Harper v. State, 
    286 Ga. 216
    , 218 (1) (686 SE2d 786) (2009).
    In 2020, Bussey filed yet another motion challenging the validity of his arrest
    warrant. The trial court denied the motion, and Bussey filed the instant application
    for discretionary review.1 We lack jurisdiction. As explained in this Court’s prior
    dismissal orders in this case, Bussey’s motion is an improper challenge to the validity
    of his conviction, and an appeal from the denial of such a motion is subject to
    dismissal. See Roberts, 286 Ga. at 532; Harper, 286 Ga. at 218 (1). In addition, “[i]t
    is axiomatic that the same issue cannot be relitigated ad infinitum,” Echols v. State,
    
    243 Ga. App. 775
    , 776 (534 SE2d 464) (2000), and the prior dismissal orders in this
    1
    Bussey filed the application in the Georgia Supreme Court, which transferred
    it here.
    case constitute binding law of the case. See Ross v. State, 
    310 Ga. App. 326
    , 327 (713
    SE2d 438) (2011).
    Accordingly, this application is hereby DISMISSED.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    01/14/2021
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A21D0168

Filed Date: 1/25/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/25/2021