Latoya R. Ortiz v. State ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    March 10, 2021
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A21A0874. LATOYA R. ORTIZ v. THE STATE.
    In 2017, Latoya R. Ortiz pleaded guilty to multiple felonies, and the trial court
    sentenced her to 40 years with 15 to serve. In 2020, Ortiz filed an “Out-of-time
    Motion to Reduce/Modify Sentence” asking the trial court to re-sentence her to a
    lesser sentence. The trial court denied the motion, and Ortiz filed this appeal. We,
    however, lack jurisdiction.
    Under OCGA § 17-10-1 (f), a court may modify a sentence during the year
    after its imposition or within 120 days after remittitur following a direct appeal,
    whichever is later. Frazier v. State, 
    302 Ga. App. 346
    , 348 (691 SE2d 247) (2010).
    Once, as here, this statutory period expires, a trial court may only modify a sentence
    if it is void. 
    Id.
     Although a direct appeal may lie from an order denying or dismissing
    a motion to vacate a void sentence, such an appeal is authorized only where the
    defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in fact, void. See Harper v.
    State, 
    286 Ga. 216
    , 217 n.1 (686 SE2d 786) (2009); Burg v. State, 
    297 Ga. App. 118
    ,
    119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). A sentence is void only if it imposes punishment that the
    law does not allow. Crumbley v. State, 
    261 Ga. 610
    , 611 (1) (409 SE2d 517) (1991).
    “Motions to vacate a void sentence generally are limited to claims that – even
    assuming the existence and validity of the conviction for which the sentence was
    imposed – the law does not authorize that sentence, most typically because it exceeds
    the most severe punishment for which the applicable penal statute provides.” von
    Thomas v. State, 
    293 Ga. 569
    , 572 (2) (748 SE2d 446) (2013).
    Here, Ortiz does not allege that her sentence exceeded the maximum
    punishment the law allows. Rather, she requests that the trial court reconsider the
    sentence and enter a more lenient sentence. Because Ortiz has not raised a valid void-
    sentence claim, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    03/10/2021
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A21A0874

Filed Date: 3/16/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/16/2021