Larry Dean Day v. State ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    March 09, 2021
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A21A1042. LARRY DEAN DAY v. THE STATE.
    In 2015, a jury found Larry Day guilty of rape, incest, and numerous related
    offenses, and the superior court imposed a total sentence of life in prison. Day filed
    a motion for a new trial, in which he raised several challenges to his convictions and
    sentences. The superior court denied relief on all grounds but one – Day’s challenge
    to the court’s failure to impose split sentences on several of his convictions. As to that
    claim, the superior court agreed that Day must be resentenced on several of his counts
    of conviction and stated that it “will resentence the Defendant as to these counts.”
    The superior court later granted Day’s motion for an out-of-time appeal, and he filed
    this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction.
    Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1), appeals generally may be taken from “[a]ll final
    judgments, that is to say, where the case is no longer pending in the court below.” The
    current record on appeal contains no indication that the superior court has resentenced
    Day in accordance with the court’s order on his motion for a new trial. Absent a new
    sentencing order, this case remains pending before the superior court. Consequently,
    Day was required to use the interlocutory appeal procedures – including obtaining a
    certificate of immediate review from the superior court – to appeal following the
    grant of his request for an out-of-time appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); accord
    Littlejohn v. State, 
    185 Ga. App. 31
    , 32 (363 SE2d 327) (1987) (this Court lacks
    jurisdiction to entertain an appeal over a criminal case that is still pending before the
    trial court); cf. Keller v. State, 
    275 Ga. 680
    , 681 (571 SE2d 806) (2002) (a criminal
    case is not final until a sentence has been entered on each conviction). Day’s failure
    to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedures deprives us of jurisdiction over
    this premature direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Crane v. State, 
    281 Ga. 635
    , 635-637 (641 SE2d 795) (2007); Boyd v. State, 
    191 Ga. App. 435
    , 435 (383
    SE2d 906) (1989); accord Littlejohn, 185 Ga. App. at 32.
    Upon entry of a new sentencing order, the superior court clerk is DIRECTED
    to re-transmit the case to this Court for re-docketing. Day need not file a second
    notice of appeal, as his prematurely filed notice of appeal will ripen upon entry of a
    new written sentence. See Perry v. State, 
    329 Ga. App. 121
    , 121 (764 SE2d 178)
    (2014); Livingston v. State, 
    221 Ga. App. 563
    , 564-568 (1) (472 SE2d 317) (1996).
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    03/09/2021
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A21A1042

Filed Date: 3/16/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/16/2021