Damian Dixon v. Everlyn Dixon ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    June 06, 2018
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A18A1617, A18A1618. DAMIAN DIXON v. EVERLYN DIXON (two cases).
    Damian Nixon filed a motion to reopen judgment under the Servicemembers
    Civil Relief Act, 
    50 USC § 3901
     et seq., after the trial court entered a final decree of
    divorce awarding his wife child custody, child support, spousal support, attorney’s
    fees, and an equitable division of marital property. The trial court denied his motion
    to reopen and Damian Nixon filed a notice of appeal on January 12, 2017. On January
    10, 2018, the trial court dismissed his appeal under OCGA § 5-6-48 (c) due to his
    unreasonable delay in filing a transcript. Case No. A18A1617 stems from the trial
    court’s dismissal of the appeal, and Case No. A18A1618 is the appeal from the trial
    court’s denial of his motion to reopen. We, however, lack jurisdiction.
    Regarding Case No. A18A1618, generally appeals from orders in domestic
    relations cases must be pursued by discretionary application. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a)
    (2). “[C]ompliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Fabe
    v. Floyd, 
    199 Ga. App. 322
    , 332 (1) (405 SE2d 265) (1991). Although OCGA § 5-6-34
    (a) (11) permits a direct appeal from all judgments or orders in “child custody cases,”
    the issue raised on appeal governs whether a custody order may be appealed directly,
    and here the issue is not custody but whether the trial court properly denied the motion
    to reopen. See Voyles v. Voyles, 
    301 Ga. 44
    , 47 (799 SE2d 160) (2017) (appeal from
    an order denying motion to set aside did not raise a custody issue on appeal). Damian
    Nixon’s failure to follow the discretionary appeal procedure deprives us of jurisdiction
    over Case No. A18A1618, which is hereby DISMISSED.
    Regarding Case No. A18A1617, a trial court’s order dismissing an appeal is
    directly appealable if the judgment being appealed from is itself directly appealable.
    Kappelmeier v. Household Realty Corp., 
    276 Ga. App. 575
    , 576 (1) (623 SE2d 752)
    (2005). As noted above, Damian Nixon’s appeal from the trial court’s denial of his
    motion to reopen was not directly appealable. Accordingly, his appeal in Case No.
    A18A1617 from the trial court’s order dismissing his appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    06/06/2018
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Wi tness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A18A1617

Filed Date: 6/26/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021