Joel A. Dallow v. Mary Ellen Dallow ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    November 09, 2016
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A17A0557. JOEL A. DALLOW v. MARY ELLEN DALLOW.
    Joel A. Dallow has filed an appeal of the trial court’s order denying his motion
    to recuse the trial court judge. We lack jurisdiction.
    In the underlying proceeding, Mary Ellen Dallow filed a petition for divorce
    from Joel Dallow. It appears that the trial court entered an order regarding the custody
    of their children, and Joel Dallow filed an appeal of that order in the Supreme Court.
    On February 23, 2016, the trial court denied Joel Dallow’s motion to recuse the trial
    court judge. Joel Dallow filed an appeal of that order in the Supreme Court. The
    Supreme Court transferred the appeal to this Court, explaining that the appeal was not
    from a final judgment of divorce and the sole issue on appeal, recusal, was a matter
    other than divorce or alimony.
    Orders denying motions to recuse are interlocutory, and appeals of such orders
    require compliance with the interlocutory appeal procedures of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b),
    including obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court. Murphy v.
    Murphy, 
    322 Ga. App. 829
    , 829-832 (747 SE2d 21) (2013); Ellis v. Stanford, 
    256 Ga. App. 294
    , 295 (2) (568 SE2d 157) (2002). Joel Dallow’s failure to comply with the
    interlocutory appeal procedures deprives us of jurisdiction. See Warringer v.
    Warringer, 
    204 Ga. App. 86
    , 86 (418 SE2d 446) (1992).1 Accordingly, this appeal is
    1
    Orders denying motions to recuse may be reviewed after the entry of final
    judgment, as part of the appeal from final judgment. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (d); Murphy,
    supra at 830-832; Ellis, supra at 295 (2). Here, while Joel Dallow contends that the trial
    court entered a final order on child custody prior to its denial of his recusal motion,
    his notice of appeal is based solely on the trial court’s denial of his recusal motion, and
    hereby DISMISSED.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    11/09/2016
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Wi tness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    it appears his case remained pending when he filed his notice of appeal. See
    Warringer, supra at 86.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A17A0557

Filed Date: 11/21/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021