Reginald L. Winfrey v. Earnelle P. Winfrey ( 2024 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    August 28, 2024
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A25A0248. REGINALD L. WINFREY v. EARNELLE P. WINFREY.
    Reginald Winfrey and Earnelle Winfrey were divorced in 2019. Their divorce
    decree, which incorporated a settlement agreement, included provisions for child
    support. In 2023, Reginald filed a petition seeking a declaration that his child support
    obligations had ended, and that Earnelle owed him child support. The parties filed
    cross-motions for summary judgment. Earnelle also sought attorney fees under OCGA
    § 9-15-14. The trial court denied Reginald’s motion for summary judgment but
    granted Earnelle’s motion for summary judgment and awarded her attorney fees.
    Reginald then filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction.
    First, “[a]ppeals from judgments or orders in divorce, alimony, and other
    domestic relations cases” must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary
    review. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2), (b). Because this case involves the collection of child
    support, it is a domestic relations case within the meaning of the statute and Reginald
    was required to file a discretionary application. See Booker v. Ga. Dept. of Human
    Resources, 
    317 Ga. App. 426
    , 426-427 (
    731 SE2d 110
    ) (2012). Second, an appeal from
    a trial court order granting or denying a request for OCGA § 9-15-14 attorney fees
    must also be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. See OCGA
    § 5-6-35 (a) (10), (b); Capricorn Systems v. Godavarthy, 
    253 Ga. App. 840
    , 841-842
    (
    560 SE2d 730
    ) (2002). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is
    jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 
    221 Ga. App. 257
    , 257 (
    471 SE2d 60
    ) (1996).
    Reginald’s failure to follow the proper procedure thus deprives us of jurisdiction over
    this direct appeal. See 
    id. at 257-258
    . Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    08/28/2024
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A25A0248

Filed Date: 8/28/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/29/2024