Hildreth v. Drewyer ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                                                         Electronically Filed
    Supreme Court
    SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
    25-MAY-2022
    10:19 AM
    Dkt. 17 ODDP
    SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
    STEFANIE B. HILDRETH, Petitioner,
    vs.
    THE HONORABLE MICHELLE L. DREWYER,
    Judge of the Family Court of the Second Circuit,
    State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judge.
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    (FC-M NO. 22-1-0058)
    ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRITS OF PROHIBITION AND MANDAMUS
    (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)
    Upon consideration of petitioner Stefanie B. Hildreth’s
    petition for writs of prohibition and mandamus, filed on May 4,
    2022, the documents attached and submitted in support, and the
    record, petitioner fails to demonstrate she has a clear and
    indisputable right to relief or that she lacks alternative means
    to seek relief.   It also cannot be said that the respondent judge
    exceeded her jurisdiction, committed a flagrant and manifest
    abuse of discretion, or refused to act on a matter properly
    before the court under circumstances in which the judge has a
    legal duty to act.   Petitioner is thus not entitled to the
    requested extraordinary writs.   See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i
    200, 204, 
    982 P.2d 334
    , 338 (1999) (explaining that a writ of
    mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless
    the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to
    relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the
    alleged wrong or obtain the requested action; such a writ is
    meant to restrain a judge who has exceeded the judge’s
    jurisdiction, has committed a flagrant and manifest abuse of
    discretion, or has refused to act on a subject properly before
    the court under circumstances in which the judge has a legal duty
    to act); Honolulu Advertiser, Inc. v. Takao, 
    59 Haw. 237
    , 241,
    
    580 P.2d 58
    , 62 (1978) (a writ of prohibition “is an
    extraordinary remedy . . . to restrain a judge of an inferior
    court from acting beyond or in excess of his [or her]
    jurisdiction”).   Accordingly,
    It is ordered that the petition for writs of
    prohibition and mandamus is denied.
    DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 25, 2022.
    /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
    /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
    /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
    /s/ Michael D. Wilson
    /s/ Todd W. Eddins
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SCPW-22-0000320

Filed Date: 5/25/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 5/25/2022