Holcomb v. Ashford ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                                          Electronically Filed
    Supreme Court
    SCPW-16-0000605
    16-SEP-2016
    01:19 PM
    SCPW-16-0000605
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
    _________________________________________________________________
    RICHARD L. HOLCOMB, Petitioner,
    vs.
    THE HONORABLE JAMES H. ASHFORD, Judge of the District Court of
    the First Circuit, State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judge,
    and
    THE STATE OF HAWAI#I and ERIC KOBASHIGAWA, Respondents.
    _________________________________________________________________
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    (CASE NO. 1DTA-16-01292)
    ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND/OR PROHIBITION
    (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
    Upon consideration of petitioner Richard L. Holcomb’s
    petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition, filed on
    September 1, 2016, the documents attached thereto and submitted
    in support thereof, and the record, it appears that, at this
    time, petitioner fails to demonstrate that he has a clear and
    indisputable right to the requested relief or that he lacks
    alternative means to seek relief.      Petitioner, therefore, is not
    entitled to the requested writ of mandamus and/or writ of
    prohibition.   See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 
    982 P.2d 334
    , 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy
    that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear
    and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means
    to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested
    action; it is meant to restrain a judge of an inferior court from
    acting beyond or in excess of his or her jurisdiction); Honolulu
    Adv., Inc. v. Takao, 
    59 Haw. 237
    , 241, 
    580 P.2d 58
    , 62 (1978) (a
    writ of prohibition is an extraordinary remedy that is meant to
    restrain a judge of an inferior court from acting beyond or in
    excess of his jurisdiction).   Accordingly,
    IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of
    mandamus and/or prohibition is denied.
    DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, September 16, 2016.
    /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
    /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
    /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
    /s/ Richard W. Pollack
    /s/ Michael D. Wilson
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SCPW-16-0000605

Filed Date: 9/16/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/17/2016