Oamilda v. 2011 Council Reapportionment Commission ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                                     Electronically Filed
    Supreme Court
    SCPW-12-0000058
    09-FEB-2012
    11:39 AM
    NO. SCPW-12-0000058
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
    GLENN OAMILDA, Petitioner,
    vs.
    2011 COUNCIL REAPPORTIONMENT COMMISSION and
    2011 STATE REAPPORTIONMENT COMMISSION, Respondents.
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    ORDER
    (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)
    Upon consideration of the petition for a writ of
    mandamus filed by petitioner Glenn Oamilda, it appears that: (1)
    Revised Ordinances of Honolulu, article III, section 3-103 does
    not require that communities remain undivided in the
    reapportionment of council districts; see Kawamoto v. Okata, 
    75 Haw. 463
    , 468-69, 
    868 P.2d 1183
    , 1186 (1994); (2) article III,
    section 3-103 does not require that council districts be drawn on
    a permanent resident population base; and (3) petitioner's
    assertions that the Council Reapportionment Commission did not
    follow lawful process are not supported by any evidence.
    Consequently, petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and
    indisputable right to relief and petitioner is not entitled to
    mandamus relief.   See Kema v. Gaddis, 
    91 Hawai'i 200
    , 204, 
    982 P.2d 334
    , 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary
    remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a
    clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative
    means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the
    requested action.).
    It further appears that: (1) petitioner's challenge to
    the 2011 Final Reapportionment Plan for the State Legislature is
    untimely; see Hawai'i Constitution, article IV, section 10; and
    (2) the 2011 Final Reapportionment Plan for the State Legislature
    was invalidated on January 4, 2012.   Therefore,
    IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
    mandamus is: (1) denied as to relief against the 2011 Council
    Reapportionment Commission and (2) dismissed as to relief against
    the 2011 State Reapportionment Commission.
    DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, February 9, 2012.
    /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
    /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
    /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
    /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.
    /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SCPW-12-0000058

Filed Date: 2/9/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/31/2014