Hawaii State Teachers Association and Hawaii Labor Relations Board ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                                                       Electronically Filed
    Supreme Court
    SCPW-13-0000053
    22-FEB-2013
    02:05 PM
    SCPW-13-0000053
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
    HAWAI#I STATE TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, Petitioner,
    and
    HAWAI#I LABOR RELATIONS BOARD; JAMES B. NICHOLSON, CHAIRPERSON,
    HAWAI#I LABOR RELATIONS BOARD; and ROCK B. LEY, MEMBER,
    HAWAI#I LABOR RELATIONS BOARD (2013-003), Respondents.
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    (HLRB CASE NO. CE-05-781)
    ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
    (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Pollack, JJ., and
    Circuit Judge Chang, in place of McKenna, J., recused)
    Upon consideration of the January 28, 2013 petition for
    a writ of mandamus filed by the Hawai#i State Teachers
    Association (“HSTA”), the documents attached thereto and
    submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that, at
    this time, the HSTA is not entitled to the requested mandamus
    relief in light of the voluminous record, the extended duration
    of the proceedings, and other relevant circumstances concerning
    the disposition of other prohibited practices cases before the
    Hawai#i Labor Relations Board.   See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i
    200, 204, 
    982 P.2d 334
    , 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an
    extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner
    demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack
    of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or
    obtain the requested action); In re Disciplinary Bd., 94 Hawai#i
    363, 368 & 371, 
    984 P.2d 688
    , 693 & 695 (1999) (mandamus relief
    is available to compel an official to perform a duty allegedly
    owed to an individual only if the individual’s claim is clear and
    certain, the official’s duty is ministerial and so plainly
    prescribed as to be free from doubt, and no other remedy is
    available).   Therefore,
    IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
    mandamus is denied.
    DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, February 22, 2013.
    /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
    /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
    /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
    /s/ Richard W. Pollack
    /s/ Gary W.B. Chang
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SCPW-13-0000053

Filed Date: 2/22/2013

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014