Gouveia v. Kim ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                                      Electronically Filed
    Supreme Court
    SCPW-13-0005887
    04-APR-2014
    12:37 PM
    SCPW-13-0005887
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
    ROYCE C. GOUVEIA, Petitioner,
    vs.
    THE HONORABLE GLENN J. KIM, JUDGE OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
    COURT, Respondent Judge,
    AND
    STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    (CR. NO. 12-1-1474)
    ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
    (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., and
    Circuit Judge Crandall, assigned by reason of vacancy.)
    Upon consideration of petitioner Royce C. Gouveia’s
    petition for a writ of mandamus, filed on December 5, 2013, the
    documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and
    the record, it appears that petitioner has filed an appeal in the
    Intermediate Court of Appeals (CAAP-14-0000358) concerning, in
    part, the circuit court’s finding of “manifest necessity” in
    granting the State of Hawai#i’s oral motion for a mistrial.
    Petitioner fails to demonstrate that he has a clear and
    indisputable right to receive the jury’s September 6, 2013
    verdict and that he lacks alternative means to seek relief.
    Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to a writ of mandamus.
    See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204-05, 
    982 P.2d 334
    , 338-39
    (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will
    not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and
    indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to
    redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested
    action; where a court has discretion to act, mandamus will not
    lie to interfere with or control the exercise of that discretion,
    even when the judge has acted erroneously, unless the judge has
    exceeded his or her jurisdiction, has committed a flagrant and
    manifest abuse of discretion, or has refused to act on a subject
    properly before the court under circumstances in which the court
    has a legal duty to act).   Accordingly,
    IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
    mandamus is denied without prejudice to petitioner raising the
    issues in his pending appeal.
    DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 4, 2014.
    /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
    /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
    /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
    /s/ Richard W. Pollack
    /s/ Virginia L. Crandall
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SCPW-13-0005887

Filed Date: 4/4/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014