Ramos-Newton v. Ayabe ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                          Electronically Filed
    Supreme Court
    SCPW-15-0000003
    21-JAN-2015
    10:13 AM
    SCPW-15-0000003
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
    CORDIALLY RAMOS-NEWTON, Petitioner,
    vs.
    THE HONORABLE BERT I. AYABE, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
    OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, Respondent Judge,
    and
    U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE TO BANK OF
    AMERICA, N.A., AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE BANK, N.A. AS
    TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF THE MLMI TRUST, MORTGAGE
    LOAN ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-HE6, and ASSOCIATION
    OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF HARBOR VISTA, Respondents.
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    (CIV. NO. 13-1-1765-06)
    ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
    (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
    Upon consideration of Petitioner Cordially Ramos-
    Newton’s petition for a writ of mandamus, filed on January 5,
    2015, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support
    thereof, and the record, it appears that Petitioner has filed an
    appeal from the foreclosure decree and the foreclosure judgment
    in CAAP-14-0001354 and that the foreclosure action remains
    pending in the circuit court.   Petitioner may seek relief in
    appeal or in the circuit court.   Petitioner, therefore, is not
    entitled to the requested writ of mandamus.   See Kema v. Gaddis,
    91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 
    982 P.2d 334
    , 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus
    is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the
    petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief
    and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged
    wrong or obtain the requested action); Honolulu Advertiser, Inc.
    v. Takao, 
    59 Haw. 237
    , 241, 
    580 P.2d 58
    , 62 (1978) (a writ of
    mandamus is not intended to supersede the legal discretionary
    authority of the trial courts, cure a mere legal error, or serve
    as a legal remedy in lieu of normal appellate procedure).
    Accordingly,
    IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
    mandamus is denied without prejudice to Petitioner seeking
    relief, as appropriate, in the appeal or the circuit court.
    DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 21, 2015.
    /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
    /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
    /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
    /s/ Richard W. Pollack
    /s/ Michael D. Wilson
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SCPW-15-0000003

Filed Date: 1/21/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/21/2015