Golden v. Tonaki ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                                                       Electronically Filed
    Supreme Court
    SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
    06-DEC-2021
    02:20 PM
    Dkt. 7 ODDP
    SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
    LUANA GOLDEN AND JALYN GOLDEN, Petitioners,
    vs.
    THE HONORABLE JOHN M. TONAKI, Judge of the Circuit Court of the
    First Circuit, State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judge,
    and
    CRAIG Y. WATASE DBA MARK DEVELOPMENT INC., Respondent.
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    (CASE NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)
    ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
    (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)
    Upon consideration of Petitioners Luana Golden and
    Jalyn Golden’s petition for writ of mandamus, filed on
    November 24, 2021, and the record, petitioners fail to
    demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to relief and have
    alternative means to seek relief, including filing a renewed
    motion for default in compliance with Rule 7 of the Rules of the
    Circuit Court of the State of Hawai#i.   Based on the record, it
    cannot be said that the respondent judge exceeded his
    jurisdiction, committed a flagrant and manifest abuse of
    discretion, or refused to act on a matter in presiding over the
    case.   Petitioners, therefore, are not entitled to the requested
    extraordinary writ.    See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204-05,
    
    982 P.2d 334
    , 338-39 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an
    extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner
    demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack
    of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or
    obtain the requested action; such a writ is meant to restrain a
    judge of an inferior court who has exceeded his or her
    jurisdiction, has committed a flagrant and manifest abuse of
    discretion, or has refused to act on a subject properly before
    the court under circumstances in which he or she has a legal duty
    to act).   Accordingly,
    It is ordered that the petition for writ of mandamus is
    denied.
    DATED:   Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 6, 2021.
    /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
    /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
    /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
    /s/ Michael D. Wilson
    /s/ Todd W. Eddins
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SCPW-21-0000671

Filed Date: 12/7/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/7/2021