Dellos v. Chang ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                                     Electronically Filed
    Supreme Court
    SCPW-12-0000051
    28-FEB-2012
    02:44 PM
    NO. SCPW-12-0000051
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
    RAQUEL A. DELLOSA, TARCILA J. DELA CRUZ, ANNALYN S. LAZARO,
    and IDA P. OANDASAN, Petitioners,
    vs.
    THE HONORABLE GARY W.B. CHANG, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT
    COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI'I and
    OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, Respondents.
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    (CIVIL NO. 09-1-1907-08)
    ORDER
    (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)
    Upon consideration of petitioners Raquel A. Dellosa,
    Tarcila J. Dela Cruz, Annalyn S. Lazaro, and Ida P. Oandasan's
    petition for a writ of mandamus and the papers in support, it
    appears that: (1) the respondent judge's December 22, 2011 order
    compelling petitioners to submit to medical and psychological
    examinations is reviewable on appeal from a final judgment
    entered in Civil No. 09-1-1907-08 and (2) disallowing observation
    or recording of the examinations and disallowing discovery of the
    examiners' general income data are not extraordinary situations
    warranting mandamus relief.    Therefore, petitioners are not
    entitled to mandamus relief.    See Kema v. Gaddis, 
    91 Hawai'i 200
    ,
    204, 
    982 P.2d 334
    , 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an
    extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner
    demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack
    of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or
    obtain the requested action.    Such writs are not intended to
    supersede the legal discretionary authority of the trial courts,
    nor are they intended to serve as legal remedies in lieu of
    normal appellate procedures.); Brende v. Hara, 
    113 Hawai'i 424
    ,
    429, 
    153 P.3d 1109
    , 1114 (2007) (Mandamus relief from discovery
    orders is "available for extraordinary situations.").
    Accordingly,
    IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
    mandamus is denied.
    DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, February 28, 2012.
    /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
    /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
    /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
    /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.
    /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SCPW-12-0000051

Filed Date: 2/28/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014