Taylor v. Chang ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                                          Electronically Filed
    Supreme Court
    SCPW-14-0001359
    11-DEC-2014
    01:53 PM
    SCPW-14-0001359
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
    SCARLETT A. TAYLOR, Petitioner,
    vs.
    THE HONORABLE GARY W.B. CHANG, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT
    COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, Respondent Judge,
    and
    ELISA M. OMEECHEVARRIA, Respondent.
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    (CIV. NO. 1CC 13-1-003006)
    ORDER
    (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
    Upon consideration of petitioner Scarlett A. Taylor’s
    letter dated November 17, 2014 and received on November 18, 2014,
    which was filed as a petition for a writ of mandamus directed to
    Judge Gary W.B. Chang, it appears petitioner is seeking: (1)
    removal of Judge Gary W.B. Chang from presiding over Taylor v.
    Omeechevarria, Civil No. 13-1-003006, which is presently pending
    in the Circuit Court of the First Circuit and the appointment of
    another judge to hear the case; and (2) supreme court review of
    the appended motion/objections to a minute order dismissing the
    circuit court case.   From a review of the record, it further
    appears that there is a hearing scheduled on December 17, 2014,
    and petitioner can raise any objections to the minute order at
    that time and seek any further relief in the circuit court
    related to the issues raised in her letter.   Petitioner also has
    a remedy by way of appeal from any adverse judgment.     Therefore,
    IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
    mandamus directed to Judge Gary W.B. Chang is denied without
    prejudice to any remedy petitioner may have in the pending
    circuit court case and without prejudice to any remedy she may
    have by way of appeal from any adverse judgment.   See Kema v.
    Gaddis, 
    91 Hawai'i 200
    , 204-05, 
    982 P.2d 334
    , 338-39 (1999)
    (writs of mandamus are not meant to supersede the legal
    discretionary authority of the lower court, nor are they intended
    to serve as legal remedies in lieu of normal appellate
    procedures).
    DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, December 11, 2014.
    /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
    /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
    /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
    /s/ Richard W. Pollack
    /s/ Michael D. Wilson
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SCPW-14-0001359

Filed Date: 12/11/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/12/2014