Bikle v. District Court Judges of Hilo ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                                                          Electronically Filed
    Supreme Court
    SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
    07-NOV-2018
    09:14 AM
    SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
    PHILIP BIKLE, Petitioner,
    vs.
    DISTRICT COURT JUDGES OF HILO, District Court of the Third
    Circuit, State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judges,
    and
    STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    (CASE NOS. 3DTC-16-005744 and 3DTI-16-016896)
    ORDER DENYING “APPLICATION FOR EXPEDITED WRIT OF MANDATE TO THE
    THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, COUNTY OF HAWAI#I, STATE OF HAWAI#I &
    APPLICATION FOR EMERGENCY STAY OF LOWER COURT PROCEEDINGS”
    (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
    Upon consideration of petitioner Philip Bikle’s
    “Application for Expedited Writ of Mandate to the Third Judicial
    Circuit, County of Hawai#i, State of Hawai#i & Application for
    Emergency Stay of Lower Court Proceedings,” filed on October 19,
    2018, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support
    thereof, and the record, it appears that petitioner fails to
    demonstrate that he is entitled to the requested relief sought by
    way of an extraordinary writ and that he lacks alternative means
    to seek relief.   See HRS § 803-6(b); HRS § 286-10; HRPP Rule
    5(b); Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 
    982 P.2d 334
    , 338
    (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will
    not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and
    indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to
    redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested
    action); Honolulu Advertiser, Inc. v. Takao, 
    59 Haw. 237
    , 241,
    
    580 P.2d 58
    , 62 (1978) (a writ of mandamus is not intended to
    supersede the legal discretionary authority of the trial courts,
    cure a mere legal error, or serve as a legal remedy in lieu of
    normal appellate procedure).   Accordingly,
    IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of
    mandamus and the request for a stay of the district court
    proceedings are denied.
    DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 7, 2018.
    /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
    /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
    /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
    /s/ Richard W. Pollack
    /s/ Michael D. Wilson
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SCPW-18-0000806

Filed Date: 11/7/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/7/2018