Chavez v. Wong ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                                                          Electronically Filed
    Supreme Court
    SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
    09-NOV-2018
    09:53 AM
    SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
    LEONARDO R. CHAVEZ, Petitioner,
    vs.
    THE HONORABLE PAUL B. K. WONG, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
    FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI#I; DEPUTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
    THALIA MURPHY; ATTORNEY SALINA KANAI ALTHOF;
    STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondents.
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    (CR. NO. 14-1-0360)
    ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
    Upon consideration of petitioner Leonardo R. Chavez’s
    petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed on October 25, 2018,
    the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof,
    and the record, it appears that petitioner presents no special
    reason for this court to invoke its jurisdiction at this time and
    fails to demonstrate that he has a clear and indisputable right
    to relief and a lack of alternative means to seek relief.        See
    Oili v. Chang, 
    57 Haw. 411
    , 412, 
    557 P.2d 787
    , 788 (1976) (the
    supreme court will not exercise its original jurisdiction in
    habeas corpus proceedings when no special reason exists for
    invoking its jurisdiction”); Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204,
    
    982 P.2d 334
    , 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary
    remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a
    clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative
    means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the
    requested action); Honolulu Advertiser, Inc. v. Takao, 
    59 Haw. 237
    , 241, 
    580 P.2d 58
    , 62 (1978) (a writ of mandamus is not
    intended to supersede the legal discretionary authority of the
    trial courts, cure a mere legal error, or serve as a legal remedy
    in lieu of normal appellate procedure).   Accordingly,
    IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of
    habeas corpus is denied.
    IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the
    appellate court shall process the petition for writ of habeas
    corpus without payment of the filing fee.
    DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 9, 2018.
    /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
    /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
    /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
    /s/ Richard W. Pollack
    /s/ Michael D. Wilson
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SCPW-18-0000823

Filed Date: 11/9/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/9/2018