Williamson v. Ashford ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                                                       Electronically Filed
    Supreme Court
    SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
    04-NOV-2022
    01:58 PM
    SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX            Dkt. 27 ODDP
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
    ________________________________________________________________
    GREGORY WILLIAMSON, Petitioner,
    vs.
    THE HONORABLE JAMES H. ASHFORD, Judge of the Circuit Court of
    the First Circuit, Respondent Judge,
    and
    ALLIANCE PERSONNEL, INC., Respondent.
    ________________________________________________________________
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    (CIV. NO. 13-1-1840)
    ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
    (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ. and
    Circuit Judge Johnson, assigned by reason of vacancy)
    Upon consideration of the “Emergency Supplement
    Notification Addition to the Emergency Third Supplement Mandamus
    Writ to the Emergency Non-Hearing Motion of August 25, 2020,”
    which was filed as a petition for writ of mandamus on October
    24, 2022, the documents attached and submitted in support, and
    the record, Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and
    indisputable right to relief from this court.    See Kema v.
    Gaddis, 91 Hawaiʻi 200, 204, 
    982 P.2d 334
    , 338 (1999).
    Moreover, Judgment in Civil No. 13-1-1840 was filed on
    December 15, 2015, and Petitioner did not file an appeal of that
    Judgment.    The first petition for writ of mandamus in this
    original proceeding was denied by order filed on September 4,
    2020.    Approximately nine months later, on June 15, 2021,
    Petitioner submitted another document that was filed as a second
    petition for writ of mandamus in this same original proceeding.
    This second petition was denied by order filed on June 17, 2021.
    Approximately one year later, Petitioner filed the subject third
    petition for writ of mandamus, which this court denies by this
    order.   This original proceeding is closed.   Accordingly,
    IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is denied.
    IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the appellate clerk
    shall process the petition without payment of the filing fee.
    IT IS HEREBY FINALLY ORDERED that the appellate
    clerk’s office shall not accept any further filings in this
    closed proceeding.
    DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, November 4, 2022.
    /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
    /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
    /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
    /s/ Michael D. Wilson
    /s/ Ronald G. Johnson
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SCPW-20-0000522

Filed Date: 11/4/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/7/2022