Colton v. Deweese ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                                                         Electronically Filed
    Supreme Court
    SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
    11-MAR-2022
    11:51 AM
    Dkt. 5 ODDP
    SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
    MARY LEE COLTON, Petitioner
    vs.
    THE HONORABLE WENDY M. DEWEESE,
    Judge of the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit,
    State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judge,
    and
    THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE
    CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF CWABS INC., ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES,
    SERIES 2007-11, Respondent.
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    (Civil. No. 13-1-082K)
    ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
    (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)
    Upon consideration of petitioner Mary Lee Colton’s
    petition for writ of mandamus, filed on March 2, 2022, and the
    record, petitioner fails to demonstrate a clear and indisputable
    right to the requested relief and has alternative means to seek
    relief, including seeking relief on appeal from an appealable
    order or judgment entered in Civil No. 13-1-082K, as provided by
    law.   Based on the record, it cannot be said that the respondent
    judge exceeded the judge’s jurisdiction, committed a flagrant and
    manifest abuse of discretion, or refused to act on a matter in
    presiding over the case.   An extraordinary writ is thus not
    warranted.   See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 
    982 P.2d 334
    , 338 (1999) (explaining that a writ of mandamus is an
    extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner
    demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack
    of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or
    obtain the requested action; such a writ is meant to restrain a
    judge who has exceeded the judge’s jurisdiction, has committed a
    flagrant and manifest abuse of discretion, or has refused to act
    on a subject properly before the court under circumstances in
    which the judge has a legal duty to act).   Accordingly,
    It is ordered that the petition for writ of mandamus is
    denied.
    It is further ordered that the clerk of the appellate
    court shall process the petition for writ of mandamus without
    payment of the filing fee.
    DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 11, 2022.
    /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
    /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
    /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
    /s/ Michael D. Wilson
    /s/ Todd W. Eddins
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SCPW-22-0000094

Filed Date: 3/11/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/11/2022