Scutt v. Dorris ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •   NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
    Electronically Filed
    Intermediate Court of Appeals
    CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
    24-JUN-2021
    08:11 AM
    Dkt. 52 SO
    NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
    IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
    OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
    JASON SCUTT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    KELLY DORRIS aka BEATRIZ NUNEZ, Defendant-Appellee
    APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT
    (CASE NO. 2DRC-XX-XXXXXXX)
    SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER
    (By:  Leonard, Presiding Judge, Wadsworth and Nakasone, JJ.)
    Self-represented Plaintiff-Appellant Jason Scutt
    (Scutt), appeals from the November 25, 2020 Order Dismissing
    Without Prejudice entered by the District Court of the Second
    Circuit, Wailuku Division (District Court).1
    We first note that Scutt's opening brief does not
    comply with Rule 28 of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure
    (HRAP). Nevertheless, to promote access to justice, the Hawai#i
    Supreme Court instructs that pleadings prepared by self-
    represented litigants should be interpreted liberally, and self-
    represented litigants should not be automatically foreclosed from
    1
    The Honorable Kirstin M. Hamman presided.
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
    appellate review because they fail to comply with court rules.
    Erum v. Llego, 147 Hawai#i 368, 380-81, 
    465 P.3d 815
    , 827-28
    (2020). Accordingly, we address Scutt's appeal on the merits to
    the extent feasible and practicable.
    Upon careful review of the record, and for the reasons
    explained below, we affirm.
    On June 25, 2020, Scutt filed a civil complaint in the
    District Court against Defendant-Appellee Kelly Dorris, also
    known as Beatriz Nunez (Nunez).2
    Nunez was served on Tuesday, July 7, 2020. The return
    of service was filed in the District Court on July 16, 2020.
    Scutt was electronically notified of the filing of the return of
    service.
    Pursuant to the information stated in the summons, the
    return date was Monday, July 20, 2020.3 However, the District
    Court's minutes indicate: Scutt was not present; Nunez was not
    present; and the case was dismissed without prejudice.4
    Scutt's Notice of Appeal was filed on July 21, 2020.
    On October 21, 2020, we temporarily remanded the case to the
    District Court for entry of a written order as required by Hawaii
    2
    The original complaint named Defendant as "B. Nunez." On July 8,
    2020, Scutt filed a Supplemental Memorandum updating Defendant's full name as
    "KELLY DORRIS AKA 'BEATRICE NUNEZ.'" (Capitalization in original).
    3
    Page 2 of the summons identified the Wailuku Division as the
    location for the return, and the return day as "8:30 a.m. on the second Monday
    following date of service, and should that Monday be a legal holiday then upon
    the next Monday." (Bolding in original).
    4
    Scutt did not request a transcript of court proceedings in this
    appeal, contrary to HRAP Rule 10(b)(1)(A), which states in pertinent part:
    When an appellant desires to raise any point on appeal
    that requires consideration of the oral proceedings before
    the court appealed from, the appellant shall file with the
    appellate clerk, within 10 days after filing the notice of
    appeal, a request or requests to prepare a reporter's
    transcript of such parts of the proceedings as the appellant
    deems necessary that are not already on file in the appeal.
    As no transcript is available, we have reviewed the District Court's minutes.
    2
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
    Revised Statutes (HRS) § 641-1(a) (2016), pursuant to Waikiki v.
    Ho#omaka Vill. Ass'n of Apartment Owners, 140 Hawai#i 197, 204,
    
    398 P.3d 786
    , 793 (2017). The Order Dismissing Without Prejudice
    was entered by the District Court on November 25, 2020. Scutt's
    notice of appeal is deemed to have been filed at that time. HRAP
    Rule 4(a)(2).
    Scutt's opening brief presents no argument about why
    the District Court's dismissal without prejudice was improper.
    The District Court had inherent power to dismiss the case for
    want of prosecution. See Compass Dev., Inc. v. Blevins, 
    10 Haw. App. 388
    , 393, 
    876 P.2d 1335
    , 1338 (1994); HRS § 604-7(e) (2016).
    Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Order
    Dismissing Without Prejudice, filed on November 25, 2020, in the
    District Court of the Second Circuit, Wailuku Division, is
    affirmed.
    DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 24, 2021.
    On the brief:                         /s/ Katherine G. Leonard
    Presiding Judge
    Jason Scutt,
    Plaintiff-Appellant                   /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth
    Associate Judge
    /s/ Karen T. Nakasone
    Associate Judge
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CAAP-20-0000467

Filed Date: 6/24/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/24/2021