Vinson v. Association of Apartment Owners of Sands of Kahana ( 2010 )


Menu:
  • §§
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PAC[F'IC REPORTER
    Nof 30345
    IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
    §§
    ,.: §§
    OF THE STATE OF HAWAITI _ §§ §§
    ii F.``“-``»‘
    . ‘ er em
    . j 4 §§
    WILLIAM T. VINSON, Trustee of the vinson Family TYu° §§
    Plaintiff-Appellee, = w3
    $”
    v `` 145 §§
    mi
    ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF SANDS OF KAHAN
    an unincorporated Hawaii condominium association,
    . Defendant-Appellant,
    'and
    JOHN DOES 1-10; JANE DOES 1-10,
    DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-lO, DOE CORPORATIONS l-10
    and DOE ENTITIES 1-10, Defendants-Appellees
    APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT
    (CIVIL NO. 09-1-OO8l)
    ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
    FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION
    (By: Nakamura, Chief Judge, Fujise and Leonard, JJ.)
    Upon review of the record, it appears that we lack
    jurisdiction over this appeal that Defendant@Appellant
    Association of Apartment Owners of Sands of Kahana (Appellant
    AOAO Sands of Kahana) has asserted from the Honorable Joel E.
    August's January 13, 2010 "Order Granting Plaintiff william T.
    Vinson's Motion for Summary Judgment Filed on November 4, 2009,
    and Denying Defendant Association of Apartment Owners of Sands of
    Kahana's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's
    Complaint Filed on February 3, 2009, Filed on November 13, 2009"
    (the January 13, 2010 summary judgment order) because the circuit
    'court has not reduced the January 13, 2010 summary judgment order
    to a separate judgment that resolves all claims against all
    parties in this case pursuant to Rule 58 of the Hawafi Rules of
    Civil Procedure (HRCP).
    \'i
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
    Hawafi Revised Statutes (HRS) § 641-1(a) (1993 § Supp.
    2009) authorizes appeals to the intermediate court of appeals
    from final judgments, orders, or decrees. Appeals under HRS
    § 641-1 "shall be taken in the manner . . . provided by the rules
    of the court." HRS § 641-1(c). The supreme court has
    promulgated HRCP Rule 58, which specifically requires that
    "[e]very judgment shall be set forth on a separate document."
    (Emphases added.) The supreme court has held that "[a]n appeal
    may be taken ; . . only after the orders have been reduced to a
    judgment and the judgment has been entered in favor of and
    against the appropriate parties pursuant to HRCP [Rule] 58[.]"
    Jenkins v. cades schutte Flemincr a wriqht, 76 Hawai‘i 115, 119,
    
    869 P.2d 1334
    , 1338 (1994) The separate judgment must "either
    resolve all claims against all parties or contain the finding
    necessary for certification under HRCP [Rule] 54(b)." lQp. "An
    appeal from an order that is not reduced to a judgment in favor
    or against the party by the time the record is filed in the
    supreme court will be dismissed." ;Qp at 120, 
    869 P.2d at 1339
    (footnote omitted). Consequently, "an order disposing of a
    circuit court case is appealable when the order is reduced to a
    separate judgment." Alford v. CitV and Count of Honolulu, 109
    Hawafii14, 20, 
    122 P.3d 809
    , 815 (2005) (citation omitted;
    emphasis added). For example, the supreme court has explained
    that, "[a]lthough RCCH [Rule] 12(q) [(regarding dismissal for
    want of prosecution)] does not mention the necessity of filing a
    separate document, HRCP [Rule] 58, as amended in 1990, expressly
    requires that ‘every judgment be set forth on a separate
    document.'" Price v. Obayashi~Hawaii Corporation, 81 Hawafi
    _2_
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION ]N WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
    l7l, 176 , 914 P . 2d 1364 , 1369 (-1996) (Emphases added .) d
    The January 13, 2010 summary judgment order is not a
    judgment, but, instead, it is an interlocutory order. On
    April 12, 2010, the appellate court clerk filed the record on
    appeal for Appeal No. 30345, at which time the record on appeal
    did not contain a separate judgment that resolves all claims in,
    this case. Absent a separate, appealable judgment, Appellant
    AOAO Sands of Kahana's appeal is premature and we lack appellate
    jurisdiction. Therefore,
    IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appeal No. 30345 is dismissed
    for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
    DATED: Honolulu, HawaiTq June 28, 2010,
    Chief Judge
    @.»..,/Qd>~d'>@:~
    Associate Judge
    *ssociate J»dge
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 30345

Filed Date: 6/28/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014