State v. Larsen ( 2010 )


Menu:
  • NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AN]) PACIFIC REPORTER
    NO. 29885
    IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
    oF THE sTATE oF HAWAI‘I
    STATE oF HAWAI‘I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
    ARIC P. LARSEN, Defendant-Appellant
    9§=1. £~J‘*»f? S‘Z HQ’E‘B§UZ
    ,.‘ 1
    irc §
    APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
    HONOLULU DIVISION
    (CASE NO. 1DTA-08-O9599)
    SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER
    (By: Foley, Presiding Judge, Fujise and Leonard, JJ.)
    Defendant-Appellant Aric P. Larsen (Larsen) appeals
    from the Judgment entered against him on May 2l, 2009, in the
    District Court of the First Circuit, Honolulu Division (District
    Larsen was convicted of Operating a Vehicle Under the
    Court).F
    in violation of Hawaii
    Influence of an Intoxicant (OVUII),
    and (b) (Supp. 2009).
    Revised Statutes § 291E-6l(a)
    that the
    On appeal, Larsen contends, inter alia,
    District Court erred by denying his motion to dismiss the charge
    because the written complaint and oral charge for OVUII failed to
    state an essential element of the offense, i.e., that Larsen
    operated or assumed actual physical control of a vehicle upon a
    public way, street, road, or highway.
    Upon careful review of the record and the briefs
    submitted by the parties and having given due consideration to
    we
    the arguments advanced and the issues raised by the parties,
    resolve Larsen's points of error as follows:
    "[T]he operation of a vehicle on a public way, street,
    road, or highway is an attendant circumstance of the offense of
    State v.
    OVUII, and is therefore an element of the offense."
    The Honorable Len0re H. Lee presided.
    l|-‘
    \
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPOIRTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
    Whee1er, 121 HaWaiH_383, 393, 
    219 P.3d 1170
    , 1180
    failure to allege that Larsen was driving a vehicle upon
    way, street, road, or highway at the time of the offense
    
    Id. the charge must
    the charge deficient. Accordingly,
    dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. we need not address
    other points of error.
    Therefore, the District Court's May 2l,
    (2009).
    The
    a public
    rendered
    be
    Larsen's
    2009 Judgment
    is vacated and this case is remanded to the District Court for
    dismissal of the OVUII charge without prejudice.
    Honolulu, HawaFi, April 28, 20lO.
    Presiding Judge ‘
    &¢.,,¢A»/@;..
    DATED:
    On the briefs:
    Timothy I. Mac Master
    for Defendant-Appellant
    Anne K. Clarkin
    Deputy Prosecuting Attorney
    for Plaintiff~Appellee
    Associate Jud
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 29885

Filed Date: 4/28/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/19/2016