U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Association of Apartment Owners of Elima Lani Condominiums ( 2022 )

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed
Intermediate Court of Appeals
CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
08-SEP-2022
08:07 AM
Dkt. 56 SO
NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I
U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF9 MASTER
PARTICIPATION TRUST, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF ELIMA LANI CONDOMINIUMS,
Defendant-Appellant, and JOHN C. PATTERSON;
FENNY J.M. PATTERSON; WAIKOLOA VILLAGE ASSOCIATION;
JOHN DOES 1-20; JANE DOES 1-20; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-20;
DOE ENTITIES 1-20; AND DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-20,
Defendants-Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT
(CIVIL NO. 18-1-011K)
SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER
(By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and McCullen, JJ.)
Defendant-Appellant Association of Apartment Owners of
Elima Lani Condominiums (Association) appeals from the Circuit
Court of the Third Circuit's December 11, 2018 "Findings of
Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order Granting [Plaintiff-Appellee
U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation
Trust's (Bank)] Motion for Summary Judgment Against All
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Defendants and for Interlocutory Decree of Foreclosure" and
Judgment. 1
Upon careful review of the record and the briefs
submitted by the parties, and having given due consideration to
the arguments advanced and the issues raised, we resolve
Association's points of error below, and affirm.
(1) Association contends that the "circuit court
committed reversible error when it purportedly vested the
Commissioner with and divested the Association of equitable
title to the Property owned by the Association." However,
nowhere in its December 11, 2018 order or judgment did the
circuit court purport to "vest" the Commissioner with title to
the subject property. See Bank of New York Mellon v. Larrua,
150 Hawai‘i 429, 445 n.18, 504 P.3d 1017, 1033 n.18 (App. 2022).
(2) Association contends that
The circuit court committed reversible error when it agreed
with Lender that the right to possess and collect rental
income from the Property was within the Commissioner's
discretion upon the entry of the [motion for summary
judgment] Order, and ordered the Commissioner "to take
possession and control of the Property" owned by the
Association, including the collection and retention of
rents.
We hold that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion by
ordering the Commissioner "to take possession and control of the
Property, including but not limited to collecting rental
payments[.]" These duties are "standard practice . . . to
1 The Honorable Robert D.S. Kim presided.
2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
facilitate a foreclosure sale and ensure preservation of the
Property for the subsequent purchaser, after the entry of the
foreclosure decree and judgment." Id. at 441, 504 P.3d at 1029.
Further, "[u]nder Hawai‘i law, a judgment entered on a
foreclosure decree is a final determination of a foreclosed
party's ownership interests in the subject property . . .
notwithstanding that further proceedings are necessary to
enforce and otherwise effectuate the foreclosure decree and
judgment." Id. at 431, 504 P.3d at 1019.
Based on the foregoing, we affirm the circuit court's
December 11, 2018 "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and
Order Granting [Bank's] Motion for Summary Judgment Against All
Defendants and for Interlocutory Decree of Foreclosure" and
Judgment.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, September 8, 2022.
On the briefs: /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
Chief Judge
R. Laree McGuire,
Defendant-Appellant. /s/ Katherine G. Leonard
Associate Judge
Robin Miller,
Charles R. Prather, /s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen
Ken Ohara, and Associate Judge
Peter T. Stone,
for Plaintiff-Appellee.
3