State v. Wilborn ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •   NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
    Electronically Filed
    Intermediate Court of Appeals
    CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
    31-DEC-2020
    08:26 AM
    Dkt. 32 ODSLJ
    NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
    IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
    OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
    STATE OF HAWAI#I, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
    ROBERTA WILBORN, Defendant-Appellant
    APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
    (CR. NO. 1CPC-XX-XXXXXXX)
    ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION
    (By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, Wadsworth and Nakasone, JJ.)
    Upon review of the record in CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX, it
    appears this court lacks appellate jurisdiction.
    On August 7, 2020, the Circuit Court issued an Order
    Pertaining to Bail which set Defendant-Appellant Roberta Wilson's
    (Appellant) bail at $200,000.00.
    On September 8, 2020, Appellant, pro se, filed a Notice
    of Appeal to Bench Warrant and Order to Arrest. In her Notice of
    Appeal, Appellant stated "I am appealing to the vindictive bench
    warrant of $200,000 Thousand Dollar." Appellant did not file a
    Statement of Jurisdiction. It appears Appellant appeals from the
    August 7, 2020 Order Pertaining to Bail because she believes the
    bail is excessive.
    "Any party aggrieved by the judgment of a circuit court
    in a criminal matter may appeal to the intermediate appellate
    court, subject to chapter 602, in the manner and within the time
    provided by the rules of court. The sentence of the court in a
    criminal case shall be the judgment." Hawaii Revised Statutes
    (HRS) § 641-11 (2016).
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
    Appellant has not been convicted and sentenced as there
    has been no trial yet. The proceeding has also not otherwise
    been terminated by an order leaving nothing further to be
    accomplished by the trial court. State v. Nicol, 140 Hawai#i
    482, 492, 
    403 P.3d 259
    , 269 (2017). Therefore, the Order
    Pertaining to Bail is not appealable pursuant to HRS § 641-11.
    Appellant can assert bail was excessive in violation of
    her rights after entry of a judgment of conviction and sentence.
    State v. Visitin, 143 Hawai#i 143, 150, 162-63, 
    426 P.3d 367
    ,
    374, 386-87 (2018) (constitutional right to bail was not
    violated). In the alternative, Appellant may seek immediate
    relief by way of a petition for writ of mandamus, Hawai#i Supreme
    Court. Pelekai v. White, 
    75 Haw. 357
    , 362, 
    861 P.2d 1205
    , 1207
    (1993); Sakamoto v. Won Bae Chang, 
    56 Haw. 447
    , 448-49, 
    539 P.2d 1197
    , 1198-99 (1975); Campiformio v. To#oto#o, SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
    (March 4, 2019), 
    2019 WL 1012090
    , at *1.
    Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is
    dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
    IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are
    dismissed.
    DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 31, 2020.
    /s/ Katherine G. Leonard
    Presiding Judge
    /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth
    Associate Judge
    /s/ Karen T. Nakasone
    Associate Judge
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CAAP-20-0000551

Filed Date: 12/31/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/31/2020