PHH Mortgage Corporation v. Patterson ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •   NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
    Electronically Filed
    Intermediate Court of Appeals
    CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
    21-MAR-2022
    09:17 AM
    Dkt. 79 SO
    NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
    IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
    OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
    PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    JOHN C. PATTERSON, FENNY J.M. PATTERSON, STATE OF HAWAII-
    DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION, Defendants-Appellees,
    and
    ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF ELIMA LANI CONDOMINIUMS,
    Defendant-Appellant,
    and
    JOHN DOES 1-50, JANE DOES 1-50, DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-50,
    DOE CORPORATIONS 1-50, DOE ENTITIES 1-50,
    AND DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-50, Defendants
    APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT
    (CIVIL NO. 14-1-121K)
    SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER
    (By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, Hiraoka and McCullen, JJ.)
    Defendant-Appellant Association of Apartment Owners of
    Elima Lani Condominiums (the AOAO) appeals from the April 4, 2018
    Judgment (Judgment) entered by the Circuit Court of the Third
    Circuit (Circuit Court).1     The AOAO also challenges, in part, the
    1
    The Honorable Robert D.S. Kim presided.
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
    Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; Order Granting
    Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and for Interlocutory
    Decree of Foreclosure entered by the Circuit Court on April 4,
    2018 (Foreclosure Decree).
    The AOAO raises two points of error on appeal,
    contending that the Circuit Court erred when it:      (1) ordered
    that the AOAO's right to possess and collect rent from the
    subject property (Property) was extinguished upon the entry of
    the Foreclosure Decree and Judgment, and order the foreclosure
    commissioner (Commissioner) to take possession and control of the
    Property owned by the AOAO, including the collection and
    retention of rents; and (2) when it vested the Commissioner with
    legal and equitable title to the Property in the Foreclosure
    Decree.
    Upon careful review of the record and the briefs
    submitted by the parties, and having given due consideration to
    the arguments advanced and the issues raised by the parties, we
    resolve the AOAO's points of error as follows:
    We conclude that the Circuit Court did not err or abuse
    its discretion in ordering the Commissioner to take possession of
    and to manage, preserve, and sell the Property, including the
    collection of rents, because under Hawai#i law, a judgment
    entered on a foreclosure decree is a final determination of a
    foreclosed party's ownership interests in the subject property,
    notwithstanding that further proceedings are necessary to enforce
    2
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
    and otherwise effectuate the foreclosure decree and judgment.
    See Bank of New York Mellon v. Larrua, No. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX, 
    2022 WL 277671
    , at *1 (Haw. App. Jan. 31, 2022).
    Regarding the vesting of title to the Property in the
    Commissioner, the Foreclosure Decree does not state that the
    title is vested in the Commissioner; rather, it states that the
    Commissioner shall hold legal and equitable title to the
    Property.   Thus, we cannot conclude that the Circuit Court erred
    by stating that the Commissioner was "vested" with legal and
    equitable title to the Property.       It appears that the
    Commissioner was simply ordered to temporarily "hold" the title,
    in conjunction with the Commissioner's role as the agent of the
    Circuit Court, in order to carry out the court's further orders
    set forth in the Foreclosure Decree.       However, we further
    conclude, even if the Foreclosure Decree could be construed as
    (erroneously) vesting title to the Property in the Commissioner,
    any such error was harmless.    See id.; see also U.S. Bank Trust
    v. Chinen, Nos. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX and CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
    (consolidated), 
    2022 WL 574511
    , *9 (Haw. App. Feb. 28, 2022).
    3
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
    For these reasons, the Circuit Court's April 4, 2018
    Judgment is affirmed.
    DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 21, 2022.
    On the briefs:                        /s/ Katherine G. Leonard
    Presiding Judge
    R. Laree McGuire,
    Jason K. Adaniya,                     /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka
    (Porter McGuire Kiakona &             Associate Judge
    Chow, LLP),
    for Defendant-Appellant.              /s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen
    Associate Judge
    David B. Rosen,
    David E. McAllister,
    Justin S. Moyer,
    (Aldridge Pite, LLP),
    for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CAAP-18-0000380

Filed Date: 3/21/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/22/2022