Madison v. Provost ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •   NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
    Electronically Filed
    Intermediate Court of Appeals
    CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
    24-MAY-2023
    08:30 AM
    Dkt. 43 OGMR
    NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
    IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
    OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I
    MARISA MADISON, fka MARISA M. PROVOST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.
    CHARLETON J. PROVOST, Defendant-Appellee.
    APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT
    (CASE NO. 2DV181000378)
    ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
    (By:    Ginoza, Chief Judge, Wadsworth and Chan, JJ.)
    Upon consideration of Plaintiff-Appellant Marisa
    Madison's (Madison) May 15, 2023 Motion for Reconsideration of
    May 10, 2023 Order Granting Motion to Dismiss Appeal (Motion for
    Reconsideration), the papers in support, and the record, it
    appears:
    (1) Madison seeks reconsideration of the court's
    May 10, 2023 Order Granting Motion to Dismiss Appeal (Dismissal
    Order);
    (2) Madison does not dispute that the court entered the
    Dismissal Order after (a) the court, on September 8, 2022,
    granted Madison relief from default of the statement of
    jurisdiction and opening brief and extended the deadline to file
    the same, (b) Madison thereafter failed to file the statement of
    jurisdiction and opening brief, and (c) Madison did not oppose
    Defendant-Appellee Charleton J. Provost's January 4, 2023 Motion
    to Dismiss Appeal;
    (3) In support of the Motion for Reconsideration,
    Madison's counsel, Barry L. Sooalo (Sooalo), asserts he was
    temporarily incapacitated, due to circumstances beyond his
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
    control, and he filed under seal his declaration, in which he
    sets forth the circumstances he was dealing with that caused him
    to not file the opening brief.        The declaration does not attach
    or include medical or health records, and it apparently does not
    contain other information which would be "personal information"
    as defined by Hawai i Court Records Rules Rule 2.19; 1 and
    (4) The court has previously cautioned and sanctioned
    Sooalo over his noncompliance with court rules, and his continued
    noncompliance burdens both the parties and the court.
    Nonetheless, Hawaii's appellate courts have "consistently adhered
    to the policy of affording litigants the opportunity to have
    their cases heard on the merits, where possible," Schefke v.
    Reliable Collection Agency, Ltd., 96 Hawai i 408, 420, 
    32 P.3d 52
    , 64 (2001) (citation and quotation marks omitted).
    Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for
    Reconsideration is granted as follows:
    1.   The Dismissal Order is vacated and the appeal is
    reinstated.
    2.   The deadline to file the opening brief and a
    statement of jurisdiction is extended to June 23, 2023.             No
    further extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary
    circumstances.
    3.   Any further default of the opening brief or
    statement of jurisdiction may result in sanctions authorized by
    Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rules 12.1(e) and 30,
    including, without limitation, monetary sanctions, dismissal of
    this appeal, or both.
    4.   Additionally, Sooalo is strongly cautioned that he
    is responsible for complying with court rules and court ordered
    deadlines and that further noncompliance may result in referral
    to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel.
    IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within ten (10) days of
    this order, Sooalo may file a motion to keep his Declaration
    (docket 41) sealed (Motion to Seal), setting forth the basis and
    1
    In filing the declaration, Sooalo also failed to include a three-inch
    top margin, or a three-inch-by-three inch space in the top right corner of the
    flyleaf, which is required by Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 32(a).
    2
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
    authority for sealing the document.     If Sooalo files a Motion to
    Seal, Defendant-Appellee Charleton J. Provost may file an
    opposition thereto within five (5) days of the motion being
    filed.
    IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in the event Sooalo does
    not file a Motion to Seal, the appellate clerk shall unseal the
    Declaration at docket 41.
    DATED:   Honolulu, Hawai i, May 24, 2023.
    /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
    Chief Judge
    /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth
    Associate Judge
    /s/ Derrick H.M. Chan
    Associate Judge
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CAAP-22-0000370

Filed Date: 5/24/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 5/24/2023