Carter v. Shields ( 2024 )


Menu:
  •   NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
    Electronically Filed
    Intermediate Court of Appeals
    CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
    01-MAY-2024
    08:06 AM
    Dkt. 47 SO
    NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
    IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
    OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
    WILLIAM H. CARTER, individually and as Successor Trustee
    of the Coolidge Carter and Mary Trenery Carter Trust No.
    Three for William H. Carter, established February 5, 1974,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    JOANNE K. SHIELDS, Defendant-Appellant; ASSOCIATION OF
    APARTMENT OWNERS OF KONA MAKAI, Defendant-Appellee,
    and
    DOE DEFENDANTS 1-50, Defendants
    APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT
    (CASE NO. 3CC16100287K)
    SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER
    (By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, Nakasone and McCullen, JJ.)
    Joanne K. Shields appeals from the "Final Judgment as
    to All Parties and All Claims" entered by the Circuit Court of
    the Third Circuit on February 13, 2019.1 We vacate in part as
    against Shields, affirm in part as against the Association of
    Apartment Owners of Kona Makai, and remand for further
    proceedings.
    William H. Carter, the successor trustee of the
    Coolidge Carter and Mary Trenery Carter Trust No. Three for
    William H. Carter, established February 5, 1974, filed the
    1
    The Honorable Henry T. Nakamoto presided.
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
    complaint below on September 8, 2016. A process server in
    California tried to serve Shields, but was told she had moved to
    India. The circuit court granted Carter's motion to serve
    Shields by publication. The affidavit of publication was filed
    on April 18, 2017. Shields did not appear at the May 10, 2017
    return hearing. Her default was entered on June 7, 2017.
    Carter moved for a default judgment against Shields.
    The circuit court entered findings of fact, conclusions of law,
    and an order granting default judgment on September 28, 2017. A
    judgment was also entered on September 28, 2017.
    Shields moved to set aside the default judgment on
    October 20, 2017. An order was entered on December 8, 2017.2
    The order conditioned setting the judgment aside on Shields
    paying "the reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred by
    [Carter]" and filing an answer to the complaint within 20 days.
    Shields' answer to Carter's complaint was filed on December 28,
    2017. On February 16, 2018, the circuit court entered an order
    requiring that Shields pay Carter $12,266.07 in attorneys fees
    and $2,367.07 in costs within 30 days.
    Shields moved for reconsideration of the February 16,
    2018 order. An order denying reconsideration was entered on
    April 24, 2018. A judgment for possession and writ of possession
    were entered on December 6, 2018. The Final Judgment was entered
    on February 13, 2019. This appeal followed.
    Shields challenges the circuit court's (1) June 7, 2017
    entry of her default; (2) September 28, 2017 "Findings of Fact,
    Conclusions of Law and Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for
    Default Judgment"; (3) February 16, 2018 "Order"; and
    (4) April 24, 2018 "Order Denying Defendant Joanne K. Shields'
    Motion to Reconsider Order Entered February 16, 2018."3
    2
    The Honorable Robert D.S. Kim presided.
    3
    Shields also challenges two of the circuit court's minute orders,
    but minute orders are not appealable orders. Abrams v. Cades, Schutte,
    Fleming & Wright, 88 Hawai#i 319, 321 & n.3, 
    966 P.2d 631
    , 633 & n.3 (1998).
    2
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
    (1)   Shields contends the circuit court erred by
    entering her default.   The published summons required Shields to
    either appear at a May 10, 2017 return hearing or to file and
    serve "an answer or other pleading" before that date. Shields
    did neither. She argues that she sent a "written settlement
    offer" which Carter's counsel acknowledged receiving. A written
    settlement offer is not a pleading under Hawai#i Rules of Civil
    Procedure (HRCP) Rule 7(a). The circuit court did not err by
    entering Shields' default.
    (2) Shields' appeal from the September 28, 2017
    "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order Granting
    Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment" is moot because the
    circuit court granted her motion to set aside the default
    judgment by order entered on December 8, 2017, from which Carter
    has not appealed.
    (3) Shields contends the circuit court erred by
    conditioning the setting aside of the default judgment on Shields
    paying Carter's attorneys fees. We review for abuse of
    discretion. James B. Nutter & Co. v. Namahoe, 153 Hawai#i 149,
    161-62, 
    528 P.3d 222
    , 234-35 (2023).
    After hearing argument from counsel, the circuit court
    stated its intent "to grant the motion with the provision that
    [Shields] pay the reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred
    by [Carter.]" Shields argues that the circuit court erroneously
    "imposed a fourth (4th) condition for setting aside a default"
    in addition to the three in BDM, Inc. v. Sageco, Inc., 
    57 Haw. 73
    , 76, 
    549 P.2d 1147
    , 1150 (1976), abrogated on other grounds by
    Chen v. Mah, 146 Hawai#i 157, 
    457 P.3d 796
     (2020). HRCP
    Rule 60(b) gives the circuit court discretion to grant relief
    from a judgment "upon such terms as are just." Applying the
    materially identical District Court Rules of Civil Procedure
    Rule 60(b), we noted that requiring a defaulted defendant to
    reimburse a plaintiff's reasonable expenses incurred because of
    the defendant's neglect would be just and proper. Bassan v.
    Holzman, 
    3 Haw. App. 677
    , 678, 
    657 P.2d 1065
    , 1066 (1983).
    3
    NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
    The circuit court did not abuse its discretion by
    conditioning the setting aside of the default judgment on Shields
    paying Carter's attorneys fees and costs. However, the court
    should have limited reimbursement to fees and costs incurred
    because of Shields' neglect — that is, only those directly
    incurred for the preparation, filing, and hearing of Carter's
    motion for default judgment. The documentation filed by Carter's
    counsel shows that the amount of the award reflected fees and
    costs other than those incurred for the motion for default
    judgment. Accordingly, we vacate the portion of the February 16,
    2018 Order awarding Carter $12,266.07 in attorneys fees and
    $2,367.07 in costs, without prejudice to Carter submitting an
    amended request for fees and costs that complies with this
    summary disposition order.
    (4) Because the circuit court acted outside its
    discretion in ordering reimbursement of Carter's attorneys fees
    and costs other than those incurred for his motion for default
    judgment, the circuit court should have granted reconsideration
    to that extent.
    For these reasons, we vacate in part the February 13,
    2019 "Final Judgment as to All Parties and All Claims" as against
    Shields, affirm in part as against the Association of Apartment
    Owners of Kona Makai, and remand this case for further
    proceedings consistent with this summary disposition order.
    DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 1, 2024.
    On the briefs:
    /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka
    Stephen D. Whittaker,                 Presiding Judge
    for Defendant-Appellant.
    /s/ Karen T. Nakasone
    Robert D. Triantos,                   Associate Judge
    Michelle Chi Dickinson,
    for Plaintiff-Appellee.               /s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen
    Associate Judge
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CAAP-19-0000132

Filed Date: 5/1/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 5/1/2024