-
ON REHEARING.
HUSTON, C. J. We have considered the petition for a rehearing filed in this ease. There is no question presented by the petition which has not been fully and repeatedly presented to and passed upon by this court. A reiteration of our conclusions would add nothing to their force, and a detailed review of the questions presented by the petition would be but an act of supererogation. The petition for a rehearing is denied.
Quarles and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 7 Idaho 220, 61 P. 1034, 1900 Ida. LEXIS 42
Judges: Huston, Quarles, Sullivan
Filed Date: 7/3/1900
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024