State v. Craig Eric Everhart ( 2014 )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Docket No. 41292
STATE OF IDAHO, ) 2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 640
)
Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Filed: July 24, 2014
)
v. ) Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
)
CRAIG ERIC EVERHART, ) THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
) OPINION AND SHALL NOT
Defendant-Appellant. ) BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
)
Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Blaine
County. Hon. Jonathan P. Brody, District Judge.
Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of five years, with two and one-half
years determinate, for unlawful possession of a firearm, affirmed.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Spencer J. Hahn, Deputy
Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
General, Boise, for respondent.
________________________________________________
Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;
and GRATTON, Judge
PER CURIAM
Craig Eric Everhart pled guilty to unlawful possession of a firearm, Idaho Code
§ 18-3316. The district court sentenced Everhart to a unified sentence of five years, with two
and one-half years determinate. Everhart appeals.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011,
1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho
1722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, Everhart’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
2