State v. Ashley Evelyn Morse ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
    Docket No. 40841
    STATE OF IDAHO,                                  )     2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 702
    )
    Plaintiff-Respondent,                     )     Filed: October 7, 2013
    )
    v.                                               )     Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
    )
    ASHLEY EVELYN MORSE,                             )     THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
    )     OPINION AND SHALL NOT
    Defendant-Appellant.                      )     BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
    )
    Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho,
    Canyon County. Hon. Molly J. Huskey, District Judge.
    Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of four years, with a minimum
    period of confinement of two years, for burglary, affirmed.
    Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben P. McGreevy, Deputy
    Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
    Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy
    Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.
    ________________________________________________
    Before LANSING, Judge; GRATTON, Judge;
    and MELANSON, Judge
    PER CURIAM
    Ashley Evelyn Morse pled guilty to burglary. I.C. § 18-1401. In exchange for her guilty
    plea, additional charges were dismissed. 1 The district court sentenced Morse to a unified term of
    four years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years. Morse also filed an I.C.R. 35
    motion for reduction of her sentence, which the district court denied. Morse appeals.
    Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
    factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
    need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 
    121 Idaho 114
    , 117-18, 
    822 P.2d 1011
    , 1014-
    1
    Morse also pled guilty to misdemeanor battery. However, she does not challenge this
    judgment of conviction or sentence on appeal.
    1
    15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 
    106 Idaho 447
    , 449-51, 
    680 P.2d 869
    , 871-73 (Ct. App.
    1984); State v. Toohill, 
    103 Idaho 565
    , 568, 
    650 P.2d 707
    , 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
    the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 
    144 Idaho 722
    , 726, 
    170 P.3d 387
    , 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
    in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
    Therefore, Morse’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
    2
    

Document Info

Filed Date: 10/7/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021