State v. Tim Moser ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
    Docket No. 38660
    STATE OF IDAHO,                                  )      2011 Unpublished Opinion No. 708
    )
    Plaintiff-Respondent,                     )      Filed: November 18, 2011
    )
    v.                                               )      Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
    )
    TIM MOSER,                                       )      THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
    )      OPINION AND SHALL NOT
    Defendant-Appellant.                      )      BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
    )
    Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho,
    Kootenai County. Hon. John P. Luster, District Judge.
    Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of eight years, with a minimum
    period of confinement of four years, for aggravated battery, affirmed.
    Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Diane M. Walker, Deputy
    Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
    Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
    General, Boise, for respondent.
    ________________________________________________
    Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;
    and MELANSON, Judge
    PER CURIAM
    Tim Moser pled guilty to aggravated battery.       
    Idaho Code §§ 18-903
    , 18-907.       The
    district court sentenced Moser to a unified term of eight years, with a minimum period of
    confinement of four years. Moser appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by
    imposing an excessive sentence.
    Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the
    factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
    need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 
    121 Idaho 114
    , 117-18, 
    822 P.2d 1011
    , 1014-
    15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 
    106 Idaho 447
    , 449-51, 
    680 P.2d 869
    , 871-73 (Ct. App.
    1984); State v. Toohill, 
    103 Idaho 565
    , 568, 
    650 P.2d 707
    , 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
    1
    the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 
    144 Idaho 722
    , 726, 
    170 P.3d 387
    , 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
    in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
    Therefore, Moser’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
    2
    

Document Info

Filed Date: 11/18/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021