State v. Brandon Michael Corral ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
    Docket No. 43160
    STATE OF IDAHO,                                 )   2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 348
    )
    Plaintiff-Respondent,                    )   Filed: January 27, 2016
    )
    v.                                              )   Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
    )
    BRANDON MICHAEL CORRAL,                         )   THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
    )   OPINION AND SHALL NOT
    Defendant-Appellant.                     )   BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
    )
    Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada
    County. Hon. Steven J. Hippler, District Judge.
    Judgment of conviction and sentence, affirmed.
    Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Reed P. Anderson, Deputy
    Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
    Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
    General, Boise, for respondent.
    ________________________________________________
    Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;
    and HUSKEY, Judge
    ________________________________________________
    PER CURIAM
    Brandon Michael Corral pleaded guilty to sexual exploitation of a child, felony, 
    Idaho Code § 18-1507
    (2)(d). The district court imposed a unified thirty-year sentence, with seven
    years determinate. Corral filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion, which the district court
    denied.1 Corral appeals.
    Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
    factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established.
    See State v. Hernandez, 
    121 Idaho 114
    , 117-18, 
    822 P.2d 1011
    , 1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State
    1
    Corral does not appeal the denial of his I.C.R. 35 motion.
    1
    v. Lopez, 
    106 Idaho 447
    , 449-51, 
    680 P.2d 869
    , 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 
    103 Idaho 565
    , 568, 
    650 P.2d 707
    , 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence,
    we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 
    144 Idaho 722
    , 726, 
    170 P.3d 387
    ,
    391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot
    say that the district court abused its discretion.
    Therefore, Corral’s judgment of conviction is affirmed.
    2
    

Document Info

Filed Date: 1/27/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/27/2016