eLaws | Code of Federal Regulations | United States Code |
 All Courts
 State Courts
 Idaho Court of Appeals
 2016-01

State v. Mehmed Halilovic ( 2016 )


Menu:
 
  •                IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Docket No. 43456
STATE OF IDAHO,                                 )   2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 339
)
Plaintiff-Respondent,                    )   Filed: January 26, 2016
)
v.                                              )   Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
)
MEHMED HALILOVIC,                               )   THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
)   OPINION AND SHALL NOT
Defendant-Appellant.                     )   BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
)
Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada
County. Hon. Richard D. Greenwood, District Judge.
Judgment of conviction and sentence, affirmed.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Andrea W. Reynolds, Deputy
Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
General, Boise, for respondent.
________________________________________________
Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;
and HUSKEY, Judge
________________________________________________
PER CURIAM
Mehmed Halilovic pleaded guilty to lewd and lascivious conduct with a child under
sixteen, felony, Idaho Code § 18-1508.       The district court imposed a unified twenty-year
sentence, with three years determinate. Halilovic filed an I.C.R. 35 motion, which the district
court denied. Halilovic appeals.1
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established.
See State v. Hernandez,
    121 Idaho 114
    , 117-18,
    822 P.2d 1011
    , 1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State
v. Lopez,
    106 Idaho 447
    , 449-51,
    680 P.2d 869
    , 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103
1
Halilovic does not appeal from the denial of his I.C.R. 35 motion.
    1 Idaho 565
    , 568,
    650 P.2d 707
    , 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence,
we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver,
    144 Idaho 722
    , 726,
    170 P.3d 387
    ,
391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot
say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, Halilovic’s judgment of conviction and sentence is affirmed.
2