State v. Dobson ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                  IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
    Docket No. 46078
    STATE OF IDAHO,                                   )
    )   Filed: April 16, 2019
    Plaintiff-Respondent,                    )
    )   Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk
    v.                                                )
    )   THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
    TAYLOR R. DOBSON,                                 )   OPINION AND SHALL NOT
    )   BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
    Defendant-Appellant.                     )
    )
    Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho,
    Canyon County. Hon. Thomas W. Whitney, District Judge.
    Order of probation on withheld judgment, affirmed.
    Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Reed P. Anderson, Deputy
    Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
    Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
    General, Boise, for respondent.
    ________________________________________________
    Before HUSKEY, Judge; LORELLO, Judge;
    and BRAILSFORD, Judge
    ________________________________________________
    PER CURIAM
    Taylor R. Dobson pled guilty to felony driving under the influence of alcohol, 
    Idaho Code §§ 18-8004
    , 18-8005. The district court withheld judgment, suspended Dobson’s driving
    privileges for five years, and placed Dobson on probation for five years. Dobson appeals,
    contending the district court abused its discretion in suspending her driver’s license for five
    years.
    Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
    factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
    need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 
    121 Idaho 114
    , 117-18, 
    822 P.2d 1011
    , 1014-
    1
    15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 
    106 Idaho 447
    , 449-51, 
    680 P.2d 869
    , 871-73 (Ct. App.
    1984); State v. Toohill, 
    103 Idaho 565
    , 568, 
    650 P.2d 707
    , 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
    the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 
    144 Idaho 722
    , 726, 
    170 P.3d 387
    , 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
    in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
    Therefore, the order of probation on withheld judgment is affirmed.
    2
    

Document Info

Filed Date: 4/16/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/16/2019