State v. Scott ML Webb ( 2014 )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Docket No. 40609
STATE OF IDAHO, ) 2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 322
)
Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Filed: January 14, 2014
)
v. ) Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
)
SCOTT ML WEBB, ) THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
) OPINION AND SHALL NOT
Defendant-Appellant. ) BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
)
Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada
County. Hon. Timothy L. Hansen, District Judge.
Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twenty-five years, with a
minimum period of confinement of ten years, for robbery, affirmed.
Stephen D. Thompson, Ketchum, for appellant.
Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
General, Boise, for respondent.
________________________________________________
Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;
and GRATTON, Judge
PER CURIAM
Scott ML Webb was convicted of robbery, Idaho Code §§ 18-6501, 18-6502, 18-204.
The district court sentenced Webb to a unified term of twenty-five years with a minimum period
of confinement of ten years. Webb appeals, contending that his sentence is excessive.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho
1
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, Webb’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
2