State v. Gwynn Ellen Boyd (Muller) ( 2016 )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Docket No. 42957
STATE OF IDAHO, ) 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 441
)
Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Filed: March 18, 2016
)
v. ) Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
)
GWYNN ELLEN BOYD aka MULLER, ) THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
) OPINION AND SHALL NOT
Defendant-Appellant. ) BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
)
Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada
County. Hon. Melissa Moody, District Judge.
Judgment of conviction and sentence, affirmed.
Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Jason C. Pintler, Deputy
Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
General, Boise, for respondent.
________________________________________________
Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; GRATTON, Judge;
and HUSKEY, Judge
________________________________________________
PER CURIAM
Gwynn Ellen Boyd was found guilty by a jury of felony battery on a police officer or
sheriff, Idaho Code §§ 18-915(3), -903(a). The district court imposed a unified five-year
sentence, with one and one-half years determinate. Boyd appeals, contending that her sentence
is excessive.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
1
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
Therefore, Boyd’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
2