State v. Melvin J. Hebdon ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
    Docket No. 37252
    STATE OF IDAHO,                                  )     2010 Unpublished Opinion No. 599
    )
    Plaintiff-Respondent,                     )     Filed: August 18, 2010
    )
    v.                                               )     Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
    )
    MELVIN J. HEBDON,                                )     THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
    )     OPINION AND SHALL NOT
    Defendant-Appellant.                      )     BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
    )
    Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, State of Idaho,
    Bannock County. Hon. David C. Nye, District Judge.
    Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twenty years, with a minimum
    period of confinement of ten years, for robbery, affirmed.
    Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis, Deputy
    Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
    Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
    General, Boise, for respondent.
    ________________________________________________
    Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; GRATTON, Judge;
    and MELANSON, Judge
    PER CURIAM
    Melvin J. Hebdon pled guilty to robbery. 
    Idaho Code §§ 18-6501
    , 18-6502. The district
    court sentenced Hebdon to a unified term of twenty years, with a minimum period of
    confinement of ten years. Hebdon appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion
    by imposing an excessive sentence.
    Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the
    factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
    need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 
    121 Idaho 114
    , 117-18, 
    822 P.2d 1011
    , 1014-
    15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 
    106 Idaho 447
    , 449-51, 
    680 P.2d 869
    , 871-73 (Ct. App.
    1984); State v. Toohill, 
    103 Idaho 565
    , 568, 
    650 P.2d 707
    , 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
    1
    the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 
    144 Idaho 722
    , 726, 
    170 P.3d 387
    , 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
    in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
    Therefore, Hebdon’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
    2
    

Document Info

Filed Date: 8/18/2010

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021