State v. Lonie Scott Finley ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
    Docket No. 38559
    STATE OF IDAHO,                                  )     2011 Unpublished Opinion No. 679
    )
    Plaintiff-Respondent,                     )     Filed: November 1, 2011
    )
    v.                                               )     Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
    )
    LONIE SCOTT FINLEY aka LONNIE                    )     THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
    SCOTT FENTON,                                    )     OPINION AND SHALL NOT
    )     BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
    Defendant-Appellant.                      )
    Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada
    County. Hon. Cheri C. Copsey, District Judge.
    Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of five years, with a minimum
    period of confinement of two years, for leaving the scene of an injury
    accident, affirmed.
    Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Jordan E. Taylor, Deputy
    Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
    Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
    General, Boise, for respondent.
    ________________________________________________
    Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;
    and MELANSON, Judge
    PER CURIAM
    Lonie Scott Finley pled guilty to leaving the scene of an injury accident. 
    Idaho Code § 18-8007
    . The district court sentenced Finley to a unified term of five years, with a minimum
    period of confinement of two years. Finley appeals.
    Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
    factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
    need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 
    121 Idaho 114
    , 117-18, 
    822 P.2d 1011
    , 1014-
    15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 
    106 Idaho 447
    , 449-51, 
    680 P.2d 869
    , 871-73 (Ct. App.
    1984); State v. Toohill, 
    103 Idaho 565
    , 568, 
    650 P.2d 707
    , 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
    1
    the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 
    144 Idaho 722
    , 726, 
    170 P.3d 387
    , 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
    in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
    Therefore, Finley’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
    2
    

Document Info

Filed Date: 11/1/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021