State v. Fernando Cortes-Ponce ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
    Docket No. 40577
    STATE OF IDAHO,                                    )        2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 690
    )
    Plaintiff-Respondent,                       )        Filed: October 2, 2013
    )
    v.                                                 )        Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
    )
    FERNANDO CORTES-PONCE,                             )        THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
    )        OPINION AND SHALL NOT
    Defendant-Appellant.                        )        BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
    )
    Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada
    County. Hon. Patrick H. Owen, District Judge.
    Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twelve years, with five years
    determinate, for trafficking in cocaine, affirmed.
    Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Jason C. Pintler, Deputy
    Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
    Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney
    General, Boise, for respondent.
    ________________________________________________
    Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;
    and GRATTON, Judge
    PER CURIAM
    Fernando    Cortes-Ponce    pled   guilty       to   trafficking   in   cocaine,   
    Idaho Code §§ 37
    -2732B(a)(2) and 18-204. The district court sentenced Cortes-Ponce to a unified term of
    twelve years, with five years determinate. Cortes-Ponce appeals, contending his sentence is
    excessive.
    Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the
    factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
    need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 
    121 Idaho 114
    , 117-18, 
    822 P.2d 1011
    ,
    1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 
    106 Idaho 447
    , 449-51, 
    680 P.2d 869
    , 871-73 (Ct. App.
    1984); State v. Toohill, 
    103 Idaho 565
    , 568, 
    650 P.2d 707
    , 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
    1
    the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 
    144 Idaho 722
    , 726, 
    170 P.3d 387
    , 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
    in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
    Therefore, Cortes-Ponce’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
    2
    

Document Info

Filed Date: 10/2/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021