State v. Furley Edward Chandler ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
    Docket No. 41079
    STATE OF IDAHO,                                  )     2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 780
    )
    Plaintiff-Respondent,                     )     Filed: December 6, 2013
    )
    v.                                               )     Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk
    )
    FURLEY EDWARD CHANDLER,                          )     THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
    )     OPINION AND SHALL NOT
    Defendant-Appellant.                      )     BE CITED AS AUTHORITY
    )
    Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada
    County. Hon. Deborah A. Bail, District Judge.
    Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of seven years, with a minimum
    period of confinement of two years, for possession of a controlled substance,
    affirmed.
    Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Kimberly E. Smith, Deputy
    Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
    Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Jessica M. Lorello, Deputy
    Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.
    ________________________________________________
    Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;
    and MELANSON, Judge
    PER CURIAM
    Furley Edward Chandler pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance. Idaho Code
    § 37-2732(c). The district court sentenced Chandler to a unified term of seven years, with a
    minimum period of confinement of two years, to run concurrently with Chandler’s other
    sentences. Chandler appeals asserting that the district court imposed an excessive sentence.
    Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
    factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and
    need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 
    121 Idaho 114
    , 117-18, 
    822 P.2d 1011
    , 1014-
    15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 
    106 Idaho 447
    , 449-51, 
    680 P.2d 869
    , 871-73 (Ct. App.
    1
    1984); State v. Toohill, 
    103 Idaho 565
    , 568, 
    650 P.2d 707
    , 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
    the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 
    144 Idaho 722
    , 726, 
    170 P.3d 387
    , 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record
    in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.
    Therefore, Chandler’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
    2